Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 4:33:56 GMT
Again and a few times now, Pedro Sánchez surprises locals and strangers with a one-man decision that is difficult to understand by the average citizen. The agreement on the Sahara , the terms of which are not yet known, with the Alawite satrap of Morocco Mohamed VI, turns our country's policy on this issue over the last almost 50 years. This decision, apparently ignored by the rest of the government, has angered its partner Unidas Podemos, the investiture supporters and has disconcerted socialist bases accustomed to unconditional support for the demands of the Sahrawi people. Support reflected black on white in the resolutions approved in the last party congresses, with the presence of a delegation from this town. “We will promote the solution to the Western Sahara conflict through compliance with the United Nations resolutions that guarantee the right of self-determination of the Sahrawi people.
To this end, we will work to reach a solution to the conflict… respectful of the principle of self-determination of the Sahrawi people …”, said the last one. It would be unforgivable if in the end you went down in history as the one who opened the door of the government to the most extreme right in democratic history and to the extreme right. As it is colloquially said "white and in a bottle", twice Chinese Thailand Phone Number List reflecting that right that we now curtail, in an agreement reached with nocturnality and treachery, we now learn that after two conversations with the US, the promoters of this act. The Americans, again the Americans. Once again, behind issues that affect a European country there is always the long shadow of the world's policeman. Or should we say the owner of the world, at least this part of it? Great move or betrayal ? To answer this crucial question, we should demand that Pedro Sánchez explain in detail what the agreement consists of, why our traditional friendship and support for the Sahrawi people is broken, and finally, in exchange for what this unnatural change is produced.
Sánchez owes this information to the rest of the parties, he owes it to his government and investiture partners and finally to his own socialist bases and his voters who are now between perplexed and indignant. Has it been leaked out of interest to ensure greater control of emigration by Morocco? In exchange for not continuing to claim Ceuta and Melilla? To allow Algerian gas to pass through their lands? Too many questions and no answers, certainly opening the risk that Algeria's anger at not having been informed will have negative consequences for its supply. It is at least curious that it has coincided with a particularly complex moment, with the opposition in full swing to a new leadership, with a terrible war in Europe and a crisis with fuel prices that has caused a transport strike that threatens supply. to the population. It didn't seem like the most appropriate moment.
To this end, we will work to reach a solution to the conflict… respectful of the principle of self-determination of the Sahrawi people …”, said the last one. It would be unforgivable if in the end you went down in history as the one who opened the door of the government to the most extreme right in democratic history and to the extreme right. As it is colloquially said "white and in a bottle", twice Chinese Thailand Phone Number List reflecting that right that we now curtail, in an agreement reached with nocturnality and treachery, we now learn that after two conversations with the US, the promoters of this act. The Americans, again the Americans. Once again, behind issues that affect a European country there is always the long shadow of the world's policeman. Or should we say the owner of the world, at least this part of it? Great move or betrayal ? To answer this crucial question, we should demand that Pedro Sánchez explain in detail what the agreement consists of, why our traditional friendship and support for the Sahrawi people is broken, and finally, in exchange for what this unnatural change is produced.
Sánchez owes this information to the rest of the parties, he owes it to his government and investiture partners and finally to his own socialist bases and his voters who are now between perplexed and indignant. Has it been leaked out of interest to ensure greater control of emigration by Morocco? In exchange for not continuing to claim Ceuta and Melilla? To allow Algerian gas to pass through their lands? Too many questions and no answers, certainly opening the risk that Algeria's anger at not having been informed will have negative consequences for its supply. It is at least curious that it has coincided with a particularly complex moment, with the opposition in full swing to a new leadership, with a terrible war in Europe and a crisis with fuel prices that has caused a transport strike that threatens supply. to the population. It didn't seem like the most appropriate moment.