Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 6:34:21 GMT
EFE TAGS: PERU EVO COUNTRY CAN The Judicial Branch of Peru confirms that Evo cannot enter that country The Judicial Branch of Peru validated the decision of the National Superintendence of Migration to prevent the entry into that country of former Bolivian President Evo Morales, issued in January 2023. A lawyer had presented a habeas corpus to annul that decision, an appeal that was declared inadmissible in the second instance, according to information from El Comercio. The Migration decision was made in.
January 2023, in the midst of protests against the government of Dina Boluarte, against Evo Morales and seven other Bolivian citizens. The Ministry of the Interior stated at that Egypt Mobile Number List time that had entered the country to carry out proselytizing activities, which affected immigration legislation, national security and internal order. In those days, the same Peruvian media had reported that twelve Evo Morales operators entered Peru at least 27 times, nine of them irregularly. It also gave an account.
The history of its operators who had been prevented from entering the national territory. Faced with the ban, Ronald Atencio, known as a lawyer and advisor to Congressman Guillermo Bermejo and who also defended former President Pedro Castillo, promoted a habeas corpus to annul that ban regarding Evo Morales. He alleged that it was a violation of Evo Morales' right, as a citizen, to enter or leave the country. The decision was appealed by Migrations and was reviewed by the Second Constitutional Chamber.
January 2023, in the midst of protests against the government of Dina Boluarte, against Evo Morales and seven other Bolivian citizens. The Ministry of the Interior stated at that Egypt Mobile Number List time that had entered the country to carry out proselytizing activities, which affected immigration legislation, national security and internal order. In those days, the same Peruvian media had reported that twelve Evo Morales operators entered Peru at least 27 times, nine of them irregularly. It also gave an account.
The history of its operators who had been prevented from entering the national territory. Faced with the ban, Ronald Atencio, known as a lawyer and advisor to Congressman Guillermo Bermejo and who also defended former President Pedro Castillo, promoted a habeas corpus to annul that ban regarding Evo Morales. He alleged that it was a violation of Evo Morales' right, as a citizen, to enter or leave the country. The decision was appealed by Migrations and was reviewed by the Second Constitutional Chamber.